Polish is not “make it prettier”
The common failure mode is turning informative sentences into prettier, emptier ones. SEO guides need readers to trust that you know where the problem is—not that every line sounds like ad copy.
Prompt for “keep facts and judgment,” not only “higher-level language.” If the draft says an old install command is unreliable, polish must keep that boundary instead of becoming “install OpeClaw quickly.”
A reusable polish prompt template
Use this for on-site guides, FAQs, and download notes. The goal is to fence the edit, not to let the model invent missing pieces.
Keep uncertainty in technical notes
Many polish passes turn “uncertain” into confident claims. For an OpeClaw download/workflow site, that is risky. Download status, model support, and connection paths should follow verifiable sources.
If the draft says “check the download page first,” polish must not become “download and install now.” If you allow free completion, the model may invent npm, brew, or curl commands for completeness.
Pre-publish polish checklist
After polish, do not only check flow—check whether risks were deleted.
- Did “wait for a verifiable entry” become “install now”?
- Did “may send to model providers” become “never leaves the device”?
- Did ordinary advice become guarantees?
- Did the structure become overly tidy three-point boilerplate?
- Does the ending naturally point to the download page or a related guide?
Polish boundary table (no new claims)
This table only restates the limits above. It does not change “polish ≠ rewriting facts,” “uncertainty must not become certainty,” or the need for human review. FAQ answers are unchanged.
| Goal | Allowed | Not allowed |
|---|---|---|
| Wording | Clearer prose; fewer mechanical transitions | Pretty empty sentences that drop information |
| Facts | Keep boundaries and [Needs verification] marks | Invent versions, commands, download counts, prices |
| Tone | Keep judgment and spoken edges | Promo voice or absolute promises |
| Download notes | Still point to the download page first | “Install now / never goes online” claims |
Templates can live in an OpeClaw workflow; every article still needs human review of facts and links.
AI polish prompts FAQ
What limits should an AI polish prompt include?
At least audience, keep facts, no exaggeration, no unverifiable data, paragraph length, tone, and final use. Otherwise polish often turns into a rewrite.
Can polish make the article sound more AI-generated?
Yes. If you only ask for “more professional and fluent,” models often make sentences too uniform. Require spoken edges, concrete scenes, and human judgment to stay.
Can polish change SEO titles?
Yes, after you confirm the target keyword and search intent. Make titles clearer—do not invent clickbait promises.
Can OpeClaw store polish templates?
Yes for reusable workflows (tutorials, download notes, FAQ, social drafts, pre-publish checks). Each piece still needs human fact review.
Should this page be treated as an official OpeClaw notice?
No. This is a third-party guide. Verify release status on the download page before installing or promising features.
Use this with an OpeClaw workflow
Check the current OpeClaw download status first, then save this guide as part of your setup, review, or troubleshooting workflow.